|
Exxon Mobil et al. have tried to defend themselves with a media blitz
as well as stepped-up lobbying, spending $28.8 million in 2005, up 44 percent from 2004. In addition to hiring former Republican
legislative aides, they've reached across the aisle: Exxon Mobil hired as a lobbyist David Leiter, former chief of staff to
2004 presidential candidate John Kerry and chief of renewable energy in the Impact on workers Soaring gasoline costs have meant cutbacks for both essential and leisure
travel. This is especially so because of the longer commutes to work than in the past, given the dispersal of the working
class from urban centers to suburbs. And rising energy costs come on top of growing indebtedness, mortgage pressures, higher
health-care premiums (or lack of insurance), etc. The New York Times profiled middle-class An economist in the U.S. Energy Information Administration said energy
prices in real dollars are the highest they’ve been since 1981 and pointed to pre-hurricane trends—since 2002-3,
home heating fuel prices have increased 50 percent and natural gas 100 percent. Other
researchers tell of people struggling with heating bills who are going without food or medical care, missing mortgage payments,
and doing without heat or hot water. A social worker told The Times, "people come to our food pantry because they're paying
for their utilities and their oil." Not surprisingly, manufacturers are using energy costs as another excuse
to move production offshore—which would mean more laid-off workers with less income to spend. This further fuels the
drop in consumption that some fear may finally kick off the recession long expected to happen when the real estate bubble
bursts. Oil-producing countries—again, except for the The predictably irrelevant response of Congress and the White House
has been a mish-mash of bills calling for increases in fuel-economy, development of alternative fuels and cars, reducing taxes
at the pump, and mild tax hikes for Big Oil (after years of mammoth tax breaks supposedly for use in new investment but rarely
used for such). Consideration is being given to expanding the areas in which
offshore drilling can occur. The House also voted to revoke some of the lease giveaways described above. Nothing has been
passed yet, but you can be sure no bill will pass with any measures strong enough to alienate any potential campaign contributors. Even Big Oil’s best friends in Congress are putting up a show. Joe Barton, Republican
chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and former employee of Atlantic Richfield, is second only to Tom Delay as
recipient of energy company funds. Yet he felt compelled to call hearings and issue stern letters to BP, which now owns Atlantic
Richfield, and Exxon Mobil, chastising them for their policies and prices. But
Barton’s real fire was saved for those actually doing something about the crisis: he accused CITGO of antitrust violations
by donating cheap heating oil, and demanded to see their records. (Barton earlier demanded to see the records of government
scientists who dared to say global warming was real.) Populist Ralph Nader, long active on energy issues, resurrected the
tired-old "break 'em up" antitrust panacea, first tried to no effect against Rockefeller’s Standard Oil trust. This
"solution" ignores the ability of corporations to refashion themselves endlessly in the face of antitrust action and regulatory
changes, always emerging bigger and stronger, and often with the same core of big shareholders. It also ignores the inevitable trend of concentration and centralization
in a capitalist economy, which forces companies to swallow smaller competitors or go under—a trend that will only be
ended not by another spurious "breakup" but by their expropriation and subjection to workers' control. Nader correctly denounces the closure of refineries, which become an
excuse to jack up prices, and exposes the price-fixing abilities of vertically integrated corporations. But the idea that
a more competitive industry would solve these problems—or even that it could long stay competitive—is a pipe dream.
And rather than call for the abolition of speculative energy-trading markets, Nader calls on Bush to raise their margin requirements. He does make one good suggestion, calling on truckers to encircle Congress and the
White House with their rigs. Certainly the West Coast troqueros who've been organizing for their rights on the job and against
high fuel prices—and who shut down L.A. ports on May 1—could lead other truckers and workers from other industries
in such actions. On May Day, Evo Morales sent soldiers and engineers to occupy foreign
oil company sites in Without an invitation, much less any thanks, from Bush or Congress—in
fact, in the face of repeated lies about a lack of democracy in Venezuela—the latter has extended this solidaristic
use of energy resources to poor neighborhoods in the U.S. Venezuela's government-owned and U.S.-based CITGO last year began
distributing discounted heating oil to poor U.S. communities in seven states. At the The example set by What can working people do? We can't count on politicians of either party to do anything serious
against the energy companies. The recent convictions of Lay and Skilling is certainly heartwarming. But under this system
neither illegal market manipulation nor legal oligopoly control can be ended. It's
worth remembering that in Ultimately, the only solution is nationalization under workers’
control of the energy industry. The first steps in popularizing such a program can include demands to open the account books
of the energy companies and their big shareholders. Committees of workers and community activists—starting with energy
workers and the communities who've seen the CITGO alternative, and gradually broadening out to other workplaces and working-class
neighborhoods—can demand access to those books, and on the basis of what they see can propose rational prices and develop
plans to reorganize energy production and consumption. This newfound information will also help such committees decide what
taxes and royalties should be imposed on these companies and on their executives' income and stolen wealth. Only such a democratic process can solve even more complex questions, such as how to conserve energy use
and restrict pollution to turn back global warming, without unnecessarily restricting workers' living standards. A massive,
national public transit system is one obvious first step. For the most complete analysis of the war and the role of neoconservatism and oil BEST DEMOCRACRY OIL CARTEL CAN BUY--and a tax break for buying an SUV.
|